54      魔兽

Can you turn off Bluetooth on Apple Watch?

Apparently, there is no option to turn off bluetooth on any fitness device in the market.

I'm sensitive to bluetooth, I'll feel uneasy or even headache when there is active bluetooth signal nearby.

I'll be very much grateful if there is an option in the setting.

Try putting on Power reserve.

Just Becks wrote:

 

Apparently, there is no option to turn off bluetooth on any fitness device in the market.

I'm sensitive to bluetooth, I'll feel uneasy or even headache when there is active bluetooth signal nearby.

I'll be very much grateful if there is an option in the setting.

I'm sensitive to bluetooth as well, everybody thinks I'm crazy but it does cause headaches with me and dizziness.  I'm curious, are you like that with WIFI too?

If you believe you have a sensitivity to Bluetooth you should see a doctor to see if you can confirm it. If you are having severe headaches frequently you should definitely see your doctor. Given the prevalence of BT devices you have BT emitting devices pretty much throughout the day everyday which would mean your headaches/dizziness would be constant.

And you should definitely divest yourself of all BT devices.

If you are sensitive to Bluetooth, then why are you using an Apple watch? It connects to your iPhone with Bluetooth so turning it off will make it closes to useless.

Hi! So I take it you're looking for any fitness tracker that does not use Bluetooth righ? You're aware that even if the Apple Watch had an option to disable BT, it would not work for the majority of its features outside if your Wi-Fi network. It does not use ad-hoc Wi-Fi, and connects to your Wi-Fi router which is also connected to the iPhone.

Anyway, I had a similar issue with my wife. She wanted a fitness tracker but is not allowed to bring ANY wireless devices to work (DoD contract)

we found this, the original UP (NOT UP2) by jawbone

https://www.amazon.com/UP-Jawbone-Packaging-Discontinued-Manufacturer/dp/B00A17IA O0

to sync, you must have an iPhone or Android, and it plugs into the headphone jack. Maybe that will do.

PS: you can use the UP as an input device on the Apple Health App too

I have the same issue with Bluetooth ,i have tried with withings pop low powered BT but even this gives headache ,would be great if apple watch had a option to turn off BT

Go talk to your doctor. You are not sensitive to bluetooth. Something else is wrong and you need to have it dealt with. There is no such thing as bluetooth sensitivity. It's pure bunk. Junk science.

Tim, do everyone a favor and do your research before embarrassing yourself with such public display of ignorance - people are posting about their real problems here, and your uninformed opinion doesn't contribute anything of value to this thread. Read up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_hypersensitivity

Yep, that's who I'd use for medical advice, Wikipedia. So when are you going to contribute something that specifically says Bluetooth causes this?

Here you go: I have a friend I have known for about 8 years. He is sensitive to electromagnetic fields. If he is close to a cell phone that's on a call, or a computer with its WiFi turned on, he gets a headache and feels sick. He can tell IF he is exposed to RF, and I have seen it with my own eyes - e.g. I always put my phone in airplane mode when I meet him and he never complains - once I forgot and he told me he had a headache. I checked and realized that I accidentally left my phone on. So I have seen it with my own eyes.

Just because someone doesn't believe it, or so called "science" (which could be defined as "the result of those studies that have gone through a gazillion bureaucratic channels that take decades for anything new to be accepted", and therefore is always a few decades behind current research) doesn't officially support it, saying that it does not exist is non-scienctific in itself. If "science", or those who claim to represent it wasn't as arrogant as it is known to be, it would say the only thing that CAN be true from a scientific perspective: "we don't have enough evidence to support this theory, but neither we have evidence of the opposite". That would be true. But meanwhile, actual people are actually getting headaches when an RF source is turned on near them, so maybe "science" doesn't have all the final answers after all.

To some people, everything has to be black and white. If it isn't proven beyond any doubt, they say (incorrectly) that it is certain it doesn't exist or isn't true. Then they can throw labels at things like "junk science" and such.

There are so many things we don't fully understand. Those who have a huge ego problem can't accept that there are things they may not fully understand. Intelligent people are able to say "I'm not sure" or "I don't know". It takes a real simpleton to be dead sure of everything in this huge world of so many unknowns.

The only actual "medical advice" I see on this thread is Tim handing out the diagnosis to the OP in no uncertain terms that he is NOT sensitive to Bluetooth.

Thanks, you've added some needed humor to this thread.

notagain007 wrote:

 

 

The only actual "medical advice" I see on this thread is Tim handing out the diagnosis to the OP in no uncertain terms that he is NOT sensitive to Bluetooth.

Given that science has not found any evidence that people are negatively affected by BT, that seems like a reasonable statement. But, it's not being represented as medical advice, just common sense.  Cite me some reputable peer-reviewed articles (PubMed is a good source) indicating that people have been demonstrated to even be able to tell that BT is on near them. Meanwhile, if you think your watch is causing a problem, see a doctor.

Given that "science" hasn't found any evidence until the 17th century that the Earth wasn't flat, while plenty of peer-reviewed studies were issued about its flatness at the same time, I find it amusing that there are still people who believe that anything "not supported by peer reviewed scientific literature"  can't be and must not possibly be true.

It's NOT a reasonable statement that something that hasn't been reviewed by enough "official" scientists with their "official" diplomas can't possibly be true. History shows that this has never been 100% the case. Accepted "scientific truth" has always been lagging behind research (it takes time to get anything accepted), and science has always been a stickler for the status quo and very reluctant to accept any changes to the historically accepted "truth".

Research costs money and money is provided mostly by businesses. As a result, some things that aren't viewed as business opportunities won't get research funds and will possibly never have enough resources to generate the accepted amount of peer-validated studies to be accepted as "true". Money can buy a lot of peer-reviewed studies, which doesn't make them less valid, but it certainly makes it doubtful that anything no one has a financial interest in studying will ever have enough studies to be elevated to the level of "scientifically accepted truth". That doesn't exclude the possibility that it MAY be true.

If there isn't enough "reputable peer-reviewed articles in PubMed" about a rare illness someone is having, does it mean that he is officially not sick? Tell him and see if he'll feel better.

There are also no "reputable peer-reviewed articles in PubMed" about any workable cure for cancer, so you could say that it is incurable and there will never be a cure, case closed. Apparently that case hasn't been closed yet, maybe because there are companies willing to fund cancer research, but no companies willing to fund enough research into electrosensitivity - it's too small, people are not dying, there isn't a profit to be made, so that case IS closed in many people's mind. Hypocrisy, anyone?

It's a complex world with a lot of things we still don't understand, so it's utterly ridiculous to say that something that hasn't been confirmed by an adequate number of "official" scientists can't possibly be true. It's the equivalent of modern day flat Earth thinking.

最后更新：2017-10-12 17:00:41

  上一篇： Using Digital Signature via USB Token on MacBoo...

  下一篇： Cannot delete email from notification